We are all saddened to learn of the loss of our friend and colleague Dr. Jason T. White. Jason has been an important part of Family Investment Center since 2005, and we’ll miss his boyish wit and wisdom about investments and the markets. Our prayers especially go out to his family and students. We’ll miss you, friend.
Showing posts with label Jason White. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jason White. Show all posts
Friday, February 28, 2014
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
The election is approaching!
With just a few days to go
before the presidential election on November 6th, it seems relevant
and timely to critically examine economic and financial policy issues. My goal is not to sway your vote one way or
the other, but rather to dispassionately consider policy challenges that will
confront the winner of the presidential race.
From my perspective,
generating high and sustained economic growth is the most paramount issue
facing the country. Presidents, like
quarterbacks, probably get too much credit when things are going well and too
much blame when times are tough. No
president in a free-market democracy can mandate or command the economy to
grow. Effective fiscal and monetary
policies are more nuanced.
Modern economic theory
supports the notion that government can and should act to attempt to stimulate
aggregate demand in times of recession or weak economic growth. The looming “fiscal cliff” or budget
sequestration is very disconcerting to many.
Tax increases and/or federal spending austerity are not the correct
short-run policies for a feeble economy with high unemployment. Without question, this issue will be job #1
for the winner of the election.
The level of the federal
deficit and national debt must be addressed during the course of the next four
years. Research economists who examined
debt and gross domestic product (GDP) data from many countries have concluded
that a debt-to-GDP ratio exceeding 80% can stifle future economic growth,
increase unemployment and cripple the federal budget as a result of the high
cost of interest to service the debt.
Our current debt-to-GDP ratio in the United States is 105%.
Strong economic growth would
help alleviate some of the pressure on the federal budget. The oft-used cliché that “a rising tide lifts
all boats” is applicable here. Economic
growth lowers the debt-to-GDP ratio, decreases unemployment and helps make
servicing the national debt more manageable.
Economic growth, as measured
by real growth in GDP, has exceeded the long-term average of 3% only two
quarters out of the past 12. This
weakness, along with political and policy uncertainty, has caused business
investment to stall and the banking system to be uncharacteristically risk
averse, particularly harming the job creation machine of small business that
has suffered under tight credit conditions.
Whoever wins the presidency
will face important policy-making decisions to address our sub-par
economy. Legislating incentives, such as
tax reformation, will generate better economic growth, increase employment and
reduce uncertainty. Exercise your right
to vote!
Dr. Jason T. White
Principal / Chief
Advisor for Research & Economics
Labels:
economy,
election,
Jason White,
presidential election
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
A question for voters
Are we better off now than we were four years ago? An article in Sunday’s issue of the St.Joseph News-Press addresses the question and asked local economists their
thoughts on important economic issues of the current election. Click here to read the article, "A decision for voters: Are you better off?"
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
White to present "Financial Wellness" seminar
At a Northwest Missouri State University seminar titled "Financial Wellness" on Wednesday,
November 30th, Dr. John Baker and Dr. Jason White will present information on how to learn responsible credit card practices, understand credit scores, and how to prevent becoming the victim of identity theft. The event is hosted by the university's Human Resources department and the University Wellness Center.
November 30th, Dr. John Baker and Dr. Jason White will present information on how to learn responsible credit card practices, understand credit scores, and how to prevent becoming the victim of identity theft. The event is hosted by the university's Human Resources department and the University Wellness Center. Both Baker and White teach in the Accounting/Economics/Finance department at Northwest Missouri State University. Dr. White is also Director of Investments at Family Investment Center.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
White comments on Ginnie Maes

Dr. Jason White, Director of Investments at Family Investment Center, was recently quoted by Financial Advisor magazine's Matt Greco in "Another Look at Ginnies." According to Greco, the 2008 financial crisis and GNMA funds’ investment in mortgages have led many to spurn these investments. But solid returns have caused some to reconsider. He asked advisors nationwide for their thoughts on the investment.
Read the full article.
Labels:
Financial Advisor magazine,
Ginnie Mae,
GNMA,
Jason White,
Matt Greco
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Market Reflections

Written by Dr. Jason White, Director of Investments at Family Investment Center
EXECUTIVE CLIENT SUMMARY
“Grinding” is the most descriptive term I can muster to characterize the economic, market, political, and international events thus far in 2011. Our 24/7/365 news cycle and the old newspaper mantra “if it bleeds, it leads” seems to have paralyzed many in a fog of uncertainty. The issues we face really aren’t new: government debt, banking problems, geopolitical instability…but constant screeching media exposure takes a toll on our collective psyche.
Hyper-focus on the crisis of the day can suck investors into a vortex of fear, confusion, and perhaps worse – inaction. Helping clients overcome these natural human reactions to uncertainty is part of the reason we are hired to manage portfolios.
Following are some brief comments on observations I have made with regard to the economy and our client portfolios. I hope you find them helpful and informative!
MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS
I have heard and read many experts comment on the potential for a double-dip recession in the second half of 2011 or early in 2012, but I find little evidence in my research to assign this a large probability of occurrence. The unemployment rate has ticked back down to 9.1%. Looking inside the numbers, public sector payrolls are generally decreasing, while private sector hiring is increasing, albeit at a speed that satisfies no one. GDP, the broadest measure of economic health, is grinding slowly higher. My 2011 forecast remains unchanged at 1.9% positive GDP growth for the year. Most economists believe we need a 3%+ GDP growth rate to see significant improvement in the unemployment picture, and I count myself among them. The economy needs to add close to 15 million new jobs to return to a “full employment” condition, where the unemployment rate is around 5%. This is the most important national challenge we face in the next 12 to 24 months.
MARKET OBSERVATIONS
The stock market moved with much volatility and with all companies in near lockstep during the first three quarters as large-, mid- and small-cap companies struggle for footing and clarity in the economy. Third quarter market uncertainty and isolated price shocks chewed up the gains for the year, mostly due to the uncertain outcome of Europe’s financial and debt crisis, and the future of the Euro currency itself. I wrote back in 1999 that a European currency union, with disaggregated fiscal and political systems, would be unsustainable in a national crisis (war, debt, natural disaster, etc.), and it appears the EU will need some emergency mending to hold the union together. Not impossible – but difficult and with an unpredictable outcome at this time.
Back in the United States, the Federal Reserve has continued to keep interest rates at historic lows to combat weakness and has announced guidance to continue relaxed monetary policy into 2013. The Fed has begun “Operation Twist,” a program to purchase longer-term government bonds with the proceeds of maturing short-term debt. Yet, corporate profits are consistently outperforming consensus expectations of analysts, despite higher energy costs and soft consumer demand.
THE DEBT CEILING
In our view, there is plenty of blame to go around for the embarrassing public display of sausage-making going on in Washington D.C. While this time seems different (as it always does), especially when amplified by the partisan media coverage coming from networks like NBC and FOX, this is no time for investors to run for the hills. We can take some comfort in the fact that the United States has been through this process many times, although there is some faint hope this time that the congressional “Super-Committee” might actually come up with some important reforms.
Pundits sarcastically comment that America always does the right thing after exhausting all other available options. They might be right in the short run, but the power of investment compounding always wins in the long run. We are still passionate practitioners of Modern Portfolio Theory, diversified asset allocation, and expense minimization. We will happily take any time necessary to help calm any fears clients may have regarding the long-run potential of the market. Contact us anytime for a “booster shot” on the science of long-run investment success!
FINAL THOUGHTS
Individual investors, thanks to the fear-and-greed genome of human nature, often make the classic and colossal mistake of trying to time the market in the short run. Academic and professional research shows repeatedly that investors tend to buy when the outlook is optimistic and sell when pessimism dominates opinion. The result is portfolio underperformance, failure to reach financial goals, and a smaller portfolio to do good works. Guiding investors toward a more dispassionate long-run diversified savings approach is what drives our thinking and actions every day.
Thursday, September 1, 2011
Jason White in Northwest Alumni Magazine
Dr. Jason White, Principal and Director of Investments at Family Investment Center and Associate Professor of Economics at Northwest Missouri State University, was recently published in the university's alumni magazine. In the article, Jason reflects on his experiences as founder and faculty adviser for the school's Students in Free Enterprise (SIFE) team and the importance of a free enterprise capitalist society.
Click here to view the full article.
Monday, April 25, 2011
Brief Investment Message from Jason White
Friends,I hope this message finds you well! With the NHL hockey playoffs at full throttle, I felt compelled to take a stab at a hockey analogy. Our investment advisory services team works relentlessly on our clients' behalf to try and skate to where the puck is going to be, rather than where it is right now. Such a principle keeps us grounded in our fundamental diversified long-term approach, even when media screeching reaches a fevered crescendo...
A Bit of News:
Recently, I was invited to be a participant in a round table panel discussion on fixed income investing at Kansas City's Interncontinental Hotel just north of the Plaza on Ward Parkway. The nearly two-hour discussion was really fascinating, and I enjoyed sharing my perspective as well as hearing from peers on investment strategy, the economy, interest rates and many other topics.
What I took away from the meeting was further validation about what we believe at FIC, and the way we go about building our customized client portfolios, our manager selection process, and our evaluation of talent.
On behalf of our entire Family Investment Center team, we are very grateful to be blessed with so many wonderful friends, and from all of us, please have a safe and peaceful Easter celebration.
Yours truly,
Jason T. White, Ph.D.
Director of Investments Family Investment Center
For an audio version of this text, click here
Labels:
Family Investment Center,
Jason White
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Missouri Western vs. Northwest Missouri
NCAA Football Playoffs
Dan Danford, Chief Executive Officer of Family Investment Center, is a Griffon super fan. Dan a graduated from Missouri Western in 1987. He was also honored with the 2003 Missouri Western State College Distinguished Alumni Service Award. Dan supports all Missouri Western athletic teams.

But on the other hand, Dr. Jason White, the firm’s Director of Investments and a Northwest faculty member, couldn’t disagree more. Jason earned a Ph.D. in Economics and Political Science from the University of Missouri in 2003, an MBA from Rockhurst University, and a BS degree in Finance from Northwest Missouri State University. He is a steadfast Bearcat fan, committed to wearing Bearcat Green and supporting all of the Bearcat teams.
By Ebonee Bright
Family Investment Center
Family Investment Center
Tension runs high at Family Investment Center this time of year. No, not because of the stock market, but because of COLLEGE FOOTBALL SEASON!
Defending national champion Northwest Missouri State University will host Missouri Western State University in the first round of the NCAA Division II football playoffs on Saturday, Nov. 20, at Bearcat Stadium in Maryville. Kickoff is set for noon.
The term ‘rivalry’ is an understatement when you live in a region like ours. With two talented football programs so close together, you find enemy fans everywhere you go! It’s especially true at Family Investment Center.
Dan Danford, Chief Executive Officer of Family Investment Center, is a Griffon super fan. Dan a graduated from Missouri Western in 1987. He was also honored with the 2003 Missouri Western State College Distinguished Alumni Service Award. Dan supports all Missouri Western athletic teams. “Jason and I agree on almost everything about investing. We disagree on almost everything when it comes to this football game! The only football point where we agree is that it will be a fun Saturday for both Western and Northwest fans. Our region is lucky to have two quality programs close enough for an intense annual rivalry. It’s a quality of life thing for everyone in our area,” Danford says.

But on the other hand, Dr. Jason White, the firm’s Director of Investments and a Northwest faculty member, couldn’t disagree more. Jason earned a Ph.D. in Economics and Political Science from the University of Missouri in 2003, an MBA from Rockhurst University, and a BS degree in Finance from Northwest Missouri State University. He is a steadfast Bearcat fan, committed to wearing Bearcat Green and supporting all of the Bearcat teams.
To order your tickets to the game, click here. If you can’t make the game, catch the play-by-play action through the Bearcat Radio Network or the online internet webcasts. Or purchase live video streaming through B2 Networks and the MIAA. Click here to view the playoff bracket.
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.
Labels:
Dan Danford,
Family Investment Center,
Football,
Jason White,
NCAA
Monday, September 20, 2010
Help for non-profits
By Dr. Jason White
Family Investment Center
Non-profit organizations have been hit hard by the recession. They're been asked to serve more people as needs increased - but they've also experienced a drop in donations as those who have funded them in the past may be holding their money a little closer than previously.
I recently addressed this time of struggle for non-profits for Mainstream, Inc. and the Kansas and Missouri Non-Profit Associations on "Future Impact of the Recession on Non-profits." If there's interest, I'm happy to give the presentation again to other similar groups. You can watch my presentation below. Thanks to SlideShare for providing the ability to share PowerPoint presentations and videos.
Family Investment Center
Non-profit organizations have been hit hard by the recession. They're been asked to serve more people as needs increased - but they've also experienced a drop in donations as those who have funded them in the past may be holding their money a little closer than previously.
I recently addressed this time of struggle for non-profits for Mainstream, Inc. and the Kansas and Missouri Non-Profit Associations on "Future Impact of the Recession on Non-profits." If there's interest, I'm happy to give the presentation again to other similar groups. You can watch my presentation below. Thanks to SlideShare for providing the ability to share PowerPoint presentations and videos.
The recession and nonprofits
View more presentations from Robyn Sekula.
Labels:
charitable giving,
Jason White,
non-profits
Friday, September 17, 2010
Media mentions: Jason White interviewed about student debt
Our own Jason White was recently interviewed by Edward Burch, a reporter for St. Joseph's own KQ2, for a story on student loan debt.
Thanks for including us, Edward!
http://stjoechannel.com/search-fulltext?nxd_id=161015
Thanks for including us, Edward!
http://stjoechannel.com/search-fulltext?nxd_id=161015
Labels:
credit cards,
Jason White,
Media mentions,
student loans
Wednesday, September 8, 2010
Warren Buffett leads by example
Dr. Jason White
Director of Investments
Family Investment Center
I was thinking back on my utter amazement when I first heard about and attempted to digest the scope and meaning of the largest philanthropic pledge in the history of mankind.
In 2006, Warren Buffett decided to give away the vast majority of his fortune, to the tune of over $40 billion. His plan was to donate 5% of his shares in Berkshire Hathaway annually, or about $1.5 billion based on 2006 share prices, to five charitable organizations, with the lion’s share flowing to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Wow – talk about role models!
Of course, the story made huge news at the time with coverage all over the print and broadcast media for several weeks. Our local papers, The Associated Press, The Wall Street Journal, CNBC-TV, and my favorite rich-guy illustrated magazine, Fortune, all weighed in on the details of the plan and speculated on what this gift meant for Berkshire Hathaway, the Buffett family, and the future of philanthropy in society.
Let me try to put the magnitude of this gift into some historical perspective, if it is even possible to do so. The July 10, 2006 issue of Fortune carried a tremendous article on the Buffett gift that I encourage you to look up and read if you are interested in the details of the arrangement. The three most charitable philanthropists in history, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. gave a combined estimated $19.8 billion dollars to charitable causes over the years spanning 1889-1960, measured in 2006 dollars. Buffett alone is personally giving away more than double that amount with a much shorter time table. Amazing!
With hindsight, it was probably not a coincidental event when Bill Gates also announced in 2006 that he would be stepping down as Chief Executive Officer of the Microsoft Corporation in order to focus more time and attention to the work of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Of the estimated $5 billion annual gift from Buffett, 83% goes directly to the Gates Foundation with specific instructions that the funds should be used immediately in support of the Gates Foundation mission. Bill and Melinda have focused their charitable work on three distinct global scourges: HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, and some assorted other human health threats.
Half of the remaining 17% of Buffett’s annual gift goes to the Susan Thompson Buffett foundation, formerly known as the Buffett foundation, but renamed after Warren’s wife Susie died many years ago. The remaining 8.5% is donated to three separate charitable foundations, each run by one of Buffett’s children.
So there is the plan. Five billion a year split among five separate charities. Even with the unprecedented size of this gift, it will still take decades for Buffett to give it all away at a $5-billion per year pace. However, don’t assume that Buffett is planning on shutting out his family entirely from inheriting a piece of his wealth. I researched Buffett’s comments from the past on inherited wealth. Going all the way back to a September 29, 1986 Fortune article, Buffett was quoted as saying “…a very rich person should leave his kids enough to do anything, but not enough to do nothing.” I am certain his heirs will be well provided for, and I really respect his personal values regarding monetary success.
What a legendary, wise, generous and beautiful man Warren Buffett is. The world will miss his living example terribly when God decides to call him home.
Director of Investments
Family Investment Center
I was thinking back on my utter amazement when I first heard about and attempted to digest the scope and meaning of the largest philanthropic pledge in the history of mankind.
In 2006, Warren Buffett decided to give away the vast majority of his fortune, to the tune of over $40 billion. His plan was to donate 5% of his shares in Berkshire Hathaway annually, or about $1.5 billion based on 2006 share prices, to five charitable organizations, with the lion’s share flowing to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Wow – talk about role models!
Of course, the story made huge news at the time with coverage all over the print and broadcast media for several weeks. Our local papers, The Associated Press, The Wall Street Journal, CNBC-TV, and my favorite rich-guy illustrated magazine, Fortune, all weighed in on the details of the plan and speculated on what this gift meant for Berkshire Hathaway, the Buffett family, and the future of philanthropy in society.Let me try to put the magnitude of this gift into some historical perspective, if it is even possible to do so. The July 10, 2006 issue of Fortune carried a tremendous article on the Buffett gift that I encourage you to look up and read if you are interested in the details of the arrangement. The three most charitable philanthropists in history, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. gave a combined estimated $19.8 billion dollars to charitable causes over the years spanning 1889-1960, measured in 2006 dollars. Buffett alone is personally giving away more than double that amount with a much shorter time table. Amazing!
With hindsight, it was probably not a coincidental event when Bill Gates also announced in 2006 that he would be stepping down as Chief Executive Officer of the Microsoft Corporation in order to focus more time and attention to the work of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Of the estimated $5 billion annual gift from Buffett, 83% goes directly to the Gates Foundation with specific instructions that the funds should be used immediately in support of the Gates Foundation mission. Bill and Melinda have focused their charitable work on three distinct global scourges: HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria, and some assorted other human health threats.
Half of the remaining 17% of Buffett’s annual gift goes to the Susan Thompson Buffett foundation, formerly known as the Buffett foundation, but renamed after Warren’s wife Susie died many years ago. The remaining 8.5% is donated to three separate charitable foundations, each run by one of Buffett’s children.
So there is the plan. Five billion a year split among five separate charities. Even with the unprecedented size of this gift, it will still take decades for Buffett to give it all away at a $5-billion per year pace. However, don’t assume that Buffett is planning on shutting out his family entirely from inheriting a piece of his wealth. I researched Buffett’s comments from the past on inherited wealth. Going all the way back to a September 29, 1986 Fortune article, Buffett was quoted as saying “…a very rich person should leave his kids enough to do anything, but not enough to do nothing.” I am certain his heirs will be well provided for, and I really respect his personal values regarding monetary success.
What a legendary, wise, generous and beautiful man Warren Buffett is. The world will miss his living example terribly when God decides to call him home.
Labels:
charitable giving,
Jason White,
philanthropy,
Warren Buffett
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Registered Investment Advisors keep clients' interests at heart

By Dr. Jason White
Family Investment Center
The world of investing and managing money can be confusing, frustrating, thrilling and gratifying all at the same time. Some folks have the financial acumen to manage their own portfolios and do quite well, while many flounder in a sea of millions of investment choices and scores of different account types and other arcane rules of the road.
If you have the time, talent and dispassionate experience needed to manage your own money, then this week’s column may not be for you, and that is just fine. The United States capital markets benefit greatly from the liquidity generated by a large number of self-interested investors. But, if you have ever considered handing off the keys to your investments portfolio to a professional, or if you have done so already, then read on.
Essentially, there are two breeds of investment advisors to choose from: Commission earning brokers who charge based on the investment products they sell, and those who work on a flat fee or “commission-free” basis, Registered Investment Advisors. Given today’s increasingly complex and intertwined financial marketplace, some traditional commissioned brokers have begun offering some types of fee-based, straddling the line between both. Yet there is a very important distinction between commissioned brokers and fee-based advisors. In legalese, it is the standard of care provided.
TAKE NOTE – A Key Point Follows
Commission-free Registered Investment Advisors (RIAs) are fiduciaries for their clients. This means that an RIA is legally and ethically bound to provide client investment services that are solely in the “best interest interest of the client.” Further commission-free (a.k.a. fee-only) RIAs must be completely transparant and disclose all fees paid by clients, by research or mutual fund companies, or any others ancillary charges – including.
Commissioned brokers are held to a much lower standard of care – the investments they recommend for customers must simply meet a “suitability” standard. Whether the recommended investment is in the best interest of the client is immaterial in the world of commissioned investment salespeople.
I have been both a commissioned broker and a commission-free (fee-only) advisor in my 20-years at the virtual intersection of the streets of Main and Wall. I will remain a passionate promoter of the commission-free RIA business model until or unless a better investment business model is developed that protects clients better than an RIA, or that is more transparent.
I’m not holding my breath waiting for this to occur.
You see, a fee-only RIA earns larger fee income from a client as that client becomes more and more wealthy. Thus, it is squarely in the best interests of both the client and the commission-free advisor to be invested in such a way as to maximize growth, income and safety over time. Clients and their advisors sleep better at night knowing that they are both on the same team. This is truly one of the best win-win scenarios available in today’s financial marketplace.
Labels:
fee-only,
investing,
Jason White,
RIA
Tuesday, August 17, 2010
Partnership Agreements: Necessity in Small Business
By Dr. Jason White
Director of Investments, Family Investment Center
Many of us at one time or another during our careers are bitten by the entrepreneurship bug. Some will be successful, while others will not. Nationally, the sobering statistics are more than 60 percent of small business start-ups fail within the first five years of operation. The most common reason for failure is that the firm/owner runs out of working capital (money) before the business begins to make a profit.
Forming a partnership can help ease the individual burden of working capital contribution, as two or more partners can fund a business start-up with less personal financial pain than a single owner.
That said, anytime a business partnership is being contemplated, prospective partners should never go into business together until the details of their partnership have been hammered out. The document to accomplish this is commonly know as a partnership agreement.
Most attorneys with business law experience are easily able to provide prospective partners with a template outlining their rights and responsibilities to the business, and one another, for a reasonable fee. In my experience, you should NEVER enter a business partnership without first making such an agreement. Unfortunately, this is something I have learned from the school of hard knocks. The following is a list of basic items that should be covered in most every general partnership agreement.
Of course, the agreement should list all the “particulars” about the owners of the prospective business, including spousal information. The document should list the name, address and social security number for each partner, along with any other aliases, maiden names, etc.
The partnership agreement should discuss generally the purpose of the business partnership; the date of formation of the partnership; and the anticipated duration of the partnership, especially if it is to be for a finite period.
The agreement should nail down exactly how profits and losses will be shared by the partners, and how much capital each partner is contributing to the enterprise. It is a good idea to also codify how additional capital contributions will be treated. Will these be treated as loans from partners, or will additional contributions change the ownership structure of the firm?
The agreement should address what happens in the event of major changes to the partners, such as death, divorce and disability. What if one partner wants to sell his/her interest a few years down the road? What is the method for calculating the value of that interest, and do the remaining partners have first rights to buy the exiting partner’s interest before it is offered to an outside party?
The agreement should also be as clear as possible regarding the duties of each partner to the partnership, and how business disputes are to be resolved in the event of disagreement.
Dealing with these sorts of issues is much easier to do before a new partnership is formed than somewhere down the road when a pitfall occurs. I have seen, and been involved in, partnerships where the partners began the business as the best of friends and ended up as mortal enemies. A solid up-front partnership agreement can provide a road map to partners having to navigate these sorts of trying times.
Labels:
entrepreneurs,
Jason White,
partners,
partnership agreements
Friday, August 13, 2010
What's your number? Part Two

Dr. Jason White
Director of Investments, Family Investment Center
This is a continuation of my last column discussion of the best-selling book "The Number" by Lee Eisenberg. I previously indicated that the book itself was primarily a moral and philosophical examination of the process of monetary accumulation. Eisenberg asks us some difficult questions regarding our motives for saving; our future plans, be they in retirement or otherwise; and the most difficult financial question of all – how big must our “number,” that is our annual income generated in retirement, be.
Page 251 of the Eisenberg primer describes for us what he calls “The Number, Quick and Dirty.” Despite the rule-of-thumb nature of the title of Eisenberg’s number calculation, his formula is actually quite elegant and comprehensive. If you are nearing retirement, or a prudent long-term planner wanting a comfortable retirement, consider plugging your financial information into the following formula.
A) Total all of your investments account balances for retirement.
B) Multiply line A by .04, which represents a safe and reasonable 4 percent rate of savings withdrawal in retirement.
C) Divide your total home equity by the number of years you plan to live in retirement. When I do such financial planning, I automatically assume a client lifespan of 100 years. If you run out of money at age 100, you probably won’t know or care anyway!
D) Divide any anticipated inheritance monies your expect to receive by the same number of years you used in part C.
E) Add the anticipated annual Social Security payment you expect to receive.You get a statement from the Social Security Administration every year showing this amount, so it shouldn’t be too tough to find.
F) Add in your annual anticipated pension or annuity payments (if any).
G) Add in realistic earnings you expect to possibly receive from part-time work, consulting, etc., if any.
H) Total lines B through G. This total represents the annual dollar amount you can reasonably and safely expect to have available to meet expenditures during your retirement years.
See, that wasn’t too horribly complex. So, how did you come out? Were you pleasantly surprised? Were your intellectual gut-feeling “number” guesses close? Are you shocked and terrified that you won’t have enough money in your golden years?
Take a deep breath.
Now you know the facts of your situation and can begin to tweak the savings or expenditure side of your personal balance sheet as you and your financial advisor see fit, especially if it appears you may be short (as most of us probably are). If you have a number of years left to retirement, or can delay retirement a few years longer than you had planned, you may be able to make up the difference with more aggressive savings. Note: I do NOT recommend more aggressive investing for folks nearing retirement for fear of principal loss and a worsening of the situation. Sometimes macroeconomic timing is just lousy. Still, even a prudent investor, with an understanding of portfolio risk, should likely never drop their stock allocation to less than 25 percent of investable assets.
The other side of the coin to examine is your anticipated retirement expenditures. Maybe regular golfing at Mozingo makes more sense for you that at St. Andrews. A reasonably priced Ford is probably nearly as reliable and comfortable as that coveted BMW. You get the idea ...
I hope you found this exercise helpful and informative. Call me if I can be of assistance to you in fulfilling your long-run dreams.
Labels:
Jason White,
Lee Eisenberg,
retirement,
social security
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Event: Impact of the Recession on Non-profits
By Dr. Jason White
Family Investment Center
In a few weeks, I'll be speaking to Mainstream, Inc. and the Kansas and Missouri Non-Profit Associations on "Future Impact of the Recession on Non-profits." The event is set for Thursday, August 26, from 1 to 4 p.m. at Cabela's in Kansas City, Kan.
It's a timely topic, as the Recession that we're currently enduring has hit them twice as hard. Many non-profits have seen an increase in requests for assistance, as many people have lost their jobs, but they've also seen a decrease in donations and, if they're living off endowment interest, a decrease in the amount of income from their endowments. It's incredibly stressful.
What I hope to do is present non-profits with strategies that can help them weather this time. I plan to cover the following points:
• Economic stress on non-profits, and how they are coping.
• Why some non-profits are weathering the storm, while others are bankrupt or headed
in that direction.
• The combined impact of lower revenues; higher costs; declining endowment values; and slower cash flow collections.
• The "nimbleness" of some non-profits that have mitigated financial damage.
• Suggested coping strategies to survive, and even thrive, this Great Recession we are enduring.
If you want to attend, you can register here: http://bit.ly/cWYW6x
Hope to see you there!
Labels:
events,
Jason White,
non-profits,
recession
Monday, June 21, 2010
Teach your kids responsible money habits early
By Dr. Jason White
Director of Investments
Family Investment Center
Every parent faces challenges in trying to educate their children about the basic principles of financial responsibility. Children and young adults are thirsty for personal financial education. Granted, their interest generally focuses on topics like how to earn a million dollars by age 23 and spend happily ever after, but we as parents and educators can use this materialist instinct to teach basic personal financial responsibility.
Benevolent employers figured out a long time ago that employees are much more likely to participate in savings programs, such as 401(k) plans, if the employer agreed to match employees’ contributions. You can apply the same logic with your kids. If Johnny manages to save $2 from his weekly allowance, match it with a dollar of your own.
Every child should have a savings account at a local bank. Teach them to deposit their savings, rather than keep idle cash in a piggy bank. After the first few interest payments are credited to their savings account, they will begin to understand and become excited about saving money.
Once the child has accumulated a few hundred dollars in that savings account, open a brokerage account for them. I’m serious! Use an online brokerage company to maximize the child’s connectivity and interactive education. Encourage them to invest in companies that they “do business with” like McDonalds, Disney or Microsoft.
Involve your children, to the extent that you are comfortable, in family financial decisions. Even young children can begin to comprehend the amount of money it takes to pay the mortgage, and the electric bill, and the groceries, etc. Once they realize the constraints of the family budget, you may find fewer temper tantrums in the checkout line when you say no regarding a “must-have” candy bar request.
Parents can also teach children wise shopping and spending habits. Let them look for bargains and coupons in the Sunday paper for products they know and use. Teach them to comparison shop and to determine relative prices. For example, should I buy the jumbo bottle of hair gel, or is the smaller size cheaper by the ounce? I am amazed how many college students, and adults for that matter, don’t seem to have the ability to do this.
Finally, teach your child about the pitfalls of debt, particularly credit card debt. The earlier they learn the expense of using other people’s money, the better. If you loan your children money to buy a toy or video game, charge them interest. They will quickly discover what they thought they couldn’t live without, maybe they could have. You will be teaching patience, frugality and personal responsibility – a set of qualities we could use more of among today’s youth!
As your child gets older, encourage him/her to read a daily newspaper and watch the evening news. Staying plugged in to events and changes in the world help to round out an individual in more than just a financial sense.
Remember – lead by example. Believe it or not, your children really do look to you for guidance!
Labels:
Jason White,
kids and money,
savings
Tuesday, May 11, 2010
Bonds explained
By Dr. Jason White
Family Investment Center
One of the bedrock fundamental approaches to successful personal investing is to proper diversify one’s portfolio based on individual factors like age, investment goals and risk tolerance. To diversify means to spread out financial risk by investing in a variety of asset classes including, but not limited to, stocks, bonds and real estate. The focus of today’s column is to provide you with some of the basic terminology from the world of bonds.
A bond represents evidence of a loan made from an investor to government, quasi-governmental agencies or corporations. Bonds are referred to as “fixed-income” securities because they typically pay a fixed rate of interest to the investor. This interest rate is known as the “coupon-rate” of interest.
The face value, known also as the par value of a bond, is paid back to the bondholder at the time of maturity. This is usually $1,000 with many bonds, but it can be just about any amount that the original issuer wished at the time of issuance. At the time of original issue, an indenture contract is put into place specifying the terms of the bond, along with any special provisions the issuer or underwriter think are necessary.

Bonds can be backed by some form of collateral, but many times they are simply debentures, meaning that no specific collateral has been pledged to back that particular bond issue. In the event of default, bondholders who enjoy the protection of specific collateral, such as mortgage bondholders, get paid back before debenture bondholders do. Still, debenture bondholders will be paid before preferred and common stockholders, so their priority claims at least have some chance of recovery.
To assist investors in making informed bond investing decisions, companies like Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Fitch Inc. analyze the financial strength of firms and issue a bond rating for the debt of those companies. The lower the bond rating of a firm is, the higher the risk for the investor. The following chart is a proxy of these rating systems, but I think you’ll get the idea.
Rating Rating Interpretation
AAA Best Quality
AA High Quality
A Upper Medium Grade
BBB Medium Grade
BB Speculative
B Very Speculative
CCC Very Very Speculative
C No Interest being Paid
D Currently in Default
Bonds with a BBB or higher rating are referred to as “investment-grade,” while bonds with a rating below BBB are known as non-investment grade or “junk bonds.” While junk bonds often pay high rates of interest, this is because they are very risky investments and should only make up a very small percentage of your portfolio, at most.
A special feature of some bonds is a call provision. Callable bonds include a provision allowing the issuing company to force early maturity by calling the bonds in. Corporations might issue callable bonds when interest rates are high, hoping to call them in before maturity and refinance the issue if interest rates go down. In the current low interest rate economic environment, I suspect that any bond which can be called already has been, at least where the issuer is financially able to refund debt.
Family Investment Center
One of the bedrock fundamental approaches to successful personal investing is to proper diversify one’s portfolio based on individual factors like age, investment goals and risk tolerance. To diversify means to spread out financial risk by investing in a variety of asset classes including, but not limited to, stocks, bonds and real estate. The focus of today’s column is to provide you with some of the basic terminology from the world of bonds.
A bond represents evidence of a loan made from an investor to government, quasi-governmental agencies or corporations. Bonds are referred to as “fixed-income” securities because they typically pay a fixed rate of interest to the investor. This interest rate is known as the “coupon-rate” of interest.
The face value, known also as the par value of a bond, is paid back to the bondholder at the time of maturity. This is usually $1,000 with many bonds, but it can be just about any amount that the original issuer wished at the time of issuance. At the time of original issue, an indenture contract is put into place specifying the terms of the bond, along with any special provisions the issuer or underwriter think are necessary.

Bonds can be backed by some form of collateral, but many times they are simply debentures, meaning that no specific collateral has been pledged to back that particular bond issue. In the event of default, bondholders who enjoy the protection of specific collateral, such as mortgage bondholders, get paid back before debenture bondholders do. Still, debenture bondholders will be paid before preferred and common stockholders, so their priority claims at least have some chance of recovery.
To assist investors in making informed bond investing decisions, companies like Moody’s Investors Service, Standard and Poor’s Financial Services LLC and Fitch Inc. analyze the financial strength of firms and issue a bond rating for the debt of those companies. The lower the bond rating of a firm is, the higher the risk for the investor. The following chart is a proxy of these rating systems, but I think you’ll get the idea.
Rating Rating Interpretation
AAA Best Quality
AA High Quality
A Upper Medium Grade
BBB Medium Grade
BB Speculative
B Very Speculative
CCC Very Very Speculative
C No Interest being Paid
D Currently in Default
Bonds with a BBB or higher rating are referred to as “investment-grade,” while bonds with a rating below BBB are known as non-investment grade or “junk bonds.” While junk bonds often pay high rates of interest, this is because they are very risky investments and should only make up a very small percentage of your portfolio, at most.
A special feature of some bonds is a call provision. Callable bonds include a provision allowing the issuing company to force early maturity by calling the bonds in. Corporations might issue callable bonds when interest rates are high, hoping to call them in before maturity and refinance the issue if interest rates go down. In the current low interest rate economic environment, I suspect that any bond which can be called already has been, at least where the issuer is financially able to refund debt.
Labels:
bonds,
callable bonds,
diversity,
Jason White
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Unemployment rate is up, and that's good news
By Dr. Jason White
Family Investment Center
The national unemployment rate rose from 9.7% to 9.9%, and I call it "good news" - why?
The unemployment rate is calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics by dividing the unemployed by the civilian labor force. Both the numerator and the denominator of this ratio rose - so what does that mean?
It means that the number of people finding jobs was up - excellent! But it also means that a large number of workers who had previously classified themselves as "discouraged workers" re-entered the labor force and began looking for jobs.
So, the labor report is positive for these two reasons: more people finding jobs, and more discouraged workers returning to look for jobs. The reason the unemployment rate rose is because of this large influx of discouraged workers re-entering the ranks of the unemployed.
The Moral: We must look beyond the headline number - what appears as a negative, a rising unemployment rate, is actually a positive as labor grows more confident in their ability to find work.
Family Investment Center
The national unemployment rate rose from 9.7% to 9.9%, and I call it "good news" - why?
The unemployment rate is calculated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics by dividing the unemployed by the civilian labor force. Both the numerator and the denominator of this ratio rose - so what does that mean?
It means that the number of people finding jobs was up - excellent! But it also means that a large number of workers who had previously classified themselves as "discouraged workers" re-entered the labor force and began looking for jobs.
So, the labor report is positive for these two reasons: more people finding jobs, and more discouraged workers returning to look for jobs. The reason the unemployment rate rose is because of this large influx of discouraged workers re-entering the ranks of the unemployed.
The Moral: We must look beyond the headline number - what appears as a negative, a rising unemployment rate, is actually a positive as labor grows more confident in their ability to find work.
Labels:
economy,
Jason White,
unemployment
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Investor Architecture
By Dr. Jason White
Principal, Director of Investments
Family Investment Center
Investors are the true long-term architects of family wealth accumulation and preservation. They are a special breed who utilize the availability of professional investment management, and have the constitution to stay with the plan, even when it appears all is lost.
All is never lost, of course. Investors intuitively understand that a retrenchment in asset prices is the time to be aggressive, not to capitulate. Investors understand the importance of saving. Investors know that short-term moves in the market (up or down) are primarily noise, sentiment or whimsy, and have little to no bearing on the long-term value of equities and the businesses they represent.
Warren Buffett describes the stock market in the short-run as a “voting machine.” Popular sentiment, psychology and herd mentality (good or bad), can drive stock prices to amazing bubble peaks and gut-wrenching price nadirs. Neither is fundamental or real. The long run investor understands this, and remains true and loyal to his plan.
It is much easier on mind and spirit to be an investor in prosperous times, than in tumult. The scientific approach to the building of wealth, as embodied in Modern Portfolio Theory, has been proven the most reliable strategy for investors since this break-through approach captured headlines and professional interest in the 1950s. Unbelievers bounce in vain from strategy to strategy always seeking a better built mousetrap, and some succeed in the short run.
Our social makeup in the information age requires near instant gratification. Those who “play the market” move like a stampeding herd, always chasing the tail of out-performance, but never quite able to grasp it. In our own myopic and self-interested view of the world, we want to be unique and special. We believe that this time is truly different. We believe in a new normal of some sort or another.
Yet, business marches forward. Equity prices ebb and flow in the near term for many reasons: news, politics, taxes, earnings, war or tranquility. Business television will run a split-screen when a powerful person, such as President Obama or Chairman Bernanke, steps to the podium. Words are spoken, the Dow Jones vacillates, and commentators link the two together painting a picture of the short-run just as Buffett’s voting machine suggests.
The fact of the matter is that the short run is just as unpredictable as it appears. Daily volatility, a reaction in stock prices to an event or series of events, seems understandable when the experts explain how good or bad news caused a positive or negative reaction in the markets. We accept these notions because the human mind wants to longs for certainty. No investor on earth knows precisely when a bear or bull market will start and finish without benefit of hindsight.
Thus, the most prudent strategy with the highest probability of success is to stay properly diversified and invested, using the proven approach of Modern Portfolio Theory, all of the time. Attempts to time the market invariably result in disappointment. Behavioral finance observes that people logically want to buy when times are good and sell when times are bad. When implemented, this strategy results in buying the market peaks, and selling during the dips – exactly the opposite of family wealth building behavior.
Dr. Jason White is Director of Investments at Family Investment Center and an Economics, Ph.D. at Northwest Missouri State University.
Labels:
Bernanke,
financial planning,
investing,
Jason White,
Warren Buffet
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

