Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Dementia can wreck family finances


By Robyn Davis Sekula

In our family, one of the first signs that Dad was struggling with mental acuity was when I watched him try to fill out a credit card slip at a restaurant. He absolutely could not figure out how to calculate a tip, something I had seen him do routinely over the years. This was about five years ago.

In subsequent years, he got much tighter with money - and worried about things that simply weren't problems. He worried intensely about my ability to pay for my three daughters' college education. I could not convince him that I make enough money and am saving aggressively for their education in a 529 plan.

Mom finally took over the checkbook at least a year ago, maybe more. That was the last of the financial decisions he was involved in.

Dementia can be incredibly destructive to a family's financial picture, certainly from mismanagement, but also from the perspective of paying for care on a long-term basis. Had my father lived more than a year, my mother would have been forced to go on Medicare because he did not have long-term care insurance.

I ran across an article, albeit two years ago, in Smart Money online about dementia and its affects on family finances. I wanted to share it with you because I thought that you might find it helpful - and as a word of caution to anyone who has elderly parents or relatives that they care for. Keep an eye out for the tale-tell signs, and step in before deep damage is done.

http://www.smartmoney.com/personal-finance/elder-care/dementia-can-wreak-havoc-on-family-finances-23715/

Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Question of the day: real estate or Roth IRAs?


We maintain an active presence on Twitter @family_finances, giving out a financial tip every day, and also taking questions from our followers. On Monday, we received a question from @therealbrandon1 who asked, "Curious what ur thoughts r...real estate vs roth ira?" Dan Danford's answer is below.

This is a question of apples and oranges. A Roth IRA is a type of account that can be invested multiple ways. Real estate is a broad investment option, much like stocks or bonds. Some real estate requires active management - rental properties, say, or construction - while others is more passive. The passive variety can be packaged into securities such as REITS or unit trusts. Actually, those securities could be purchased in a Roth or other IRA just like stocks, bonds, or mutual funds. Active real estate investors know that leverage (borrowing money to buy properties) is one of the appealing aspects of ownership. IRAs are prohibited from borrowing, so that's one reason why active real estate isn't a strong choice for IRA investing.

But I do think real estate can be one component of retirement investing. Many of the world's great fortunes were made in real estate. The two big factors to consider are liquidity and leverage. Liquidity simply means that it's tough to monetize your real estate investments when you need money. You must sell or borrow against them, and neither option is fast or assured. Leverage is what makes real estate so potentially profitable, but it's a double-edged sword. That same leverage makes it risky, and banks foreclose on real estate every single day. It's a high-risk, high reward business. For most people, owning their home is the only exposure they need to this sector of investing.

Monday, June 28, 2010

Dad's Divorce: How do I pick 401(k) investments?

Dan Danford regularly posts video blogs on Dad's Divorce, a web site for men going through the divorce process. But his advice almost always applies to anyone. This week, he answers a question from a viewer about how to pick 401(k) investments.

Here's the post - let us know what you think in the comments.

Thursday, June 24, 2010

An interview with Dan Danford



First of all, what do you do?

Dan Danford – I understand investments and finance better than most people, and I explain things really well. People ask me to help.

What exactly does Family Investment Center do?

Two main things. We manage large portfolios for clients. These are discretionary accounts for families, nonprofits, and companies. We use proven techniques, based on decades of academic research, to design, implement, and review portfolios. Another facet is consulting, where we do research and evaluation for nonprofit and corporate clients. Our internal team is remarkable.

How’s business?

Good. Most of our new business happens when people move portfolios to our care from somewhere else. Movement slows when the economy shudders, and the past few years have been traumatic. Despite that, though, we’ve continued to maintain our client base and Assets Under Management (AUM). Actually, we’ve been pruning a bit.

How do you differ from stockbrokers or other firms?

Family Investment Center is registered to actively manage portfolios. We don’t sell investments, and we don’t earn or charge sales commissions. Among competitors, we probably look most like the trust department of a bank, although we are regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We have a fiduciary duty to our clients and we are genuinely independent.

Independent? What does that mean?

In the investment world, over ninety percent of professionals are aligned with some large firm. Brokerage, maybe, or a bank or insurance company. There’s a tendency to create and sell certain products or services. There’s a huge amount of redundancy in the marketplace and a host of mediocre products. Firms like ours have no ownership or financial alignment with other companies. We’re free to choose products and services that excel for our clients. From thousands of good choices.

I’m not sure I understand.

Ask yourself this: does the world need 26,000 mutual funds? Seriously, there are over 9,000 bond funds tracked by Morningstar. Bond funds! Few have the long-term performance of Bill Gross and the PIMCO organization. So there are a few stellar performers and most of the rest are mired in mediocrity. Why do they even exist? Because they create revenue or convenience for some particular investment firm. It’s not for the consumer, that’s for sure. That’s just one example, of course. There are thousands.

How much does any of that matter?

I think the business structure matters a lot. Obviously, what’s most important is competence and trustworthiness, but there is a big advantage to staying in a commission-free environment. Salespeople simply aren’t – can’t be – objective. Mostly, they are the ones selling those mediocre products.

And, again generally, I think it’s best to use bankers for borrowing, and insurance agents for insurance. I’m not fond of cross selling.

I’ve never heard that before. Why?

I just think specialization has value. How many pitchers also hit 300? How many successful physicians also keep the books? It's hard to be really good at multiple tasks. Banks and insurance companies have their strengths; investing isn’t often one of them.

A related mistake, I think, is that people somehow equate big with good. They think it’s safer or better to work with a big bank or big brokerage firm. Remember, those are the banks that brought us TARP, and that Lehman Brothers – among the biggest of big investment firms – collapsed entirely. Both groups played a hand in the mortgage crisis and its aftermath. Bigger is not necessarily better.

What should consumers look for in choosing an advisor?

There are at least three really important things to consider. First, what is this advisor’s history? Were they insurance people? Stockbrokers? Bankers? It’s important because their initial training – and possibly their belief system – hales back to that early history. Just realize that they likely have some bias shaded by history.

Next, whom do they serve? Their clients should look and live a lot like you. Sometimes I see these people selling tax-free bonds to folks who don’t even need them. Seriously, most advisors have expertise with one kind of client or another. Maybe two. You want one who helps other people in similar situations. Unless advice fits your personal circumstances, it isn’t very helpful.

Last, and maybe most important of all, do you want a long-term relationship with this person? I’m not saying you have to socialize with them, necessarily. Just ask yourself, is this someone I want to work with and rely on for the next decade or two? If not, I’d keep looking.

What about investing? None of the top three is performance?

Good point. Let’s just say that investment performance alone isn’t enough. Good investing is always better for these three factors. In fact, investing is about achieving goals. That happens more easily when you work with similar families, engage in a long-term relationship, and understand some professional history.

What’s the very best thing an advisor can do for a client? And don’t just say, “make them money.” What should clients look for from a good advisory relationship?

Now, that’s a great question. I work with a lot of really smart people and most of them could manage investments. What they lack is context. They read an article or see a powerful spot on television, and they think maybe that’s a good idea. But they’ve not seen anything like it before, or during any other time frames. They don’t know exactly how it works or whether is works all the time. Or half the time. That’s the value a good advisor brings. They’ve seen it all before, and whether it works or fails. They’ve seen it with other similar families, and they’ve studied it in trade journals. With thousands of products and strategies, that’s valuable insight.

Is it worth paying for, though? And how much?

Well, how much could it help your family? I can suggest a tweak to your investment mix that generates an extra $50,000 over the next twenty-five years. What’s that worth to you? Maybe I’ll talk you into or out of some strategic move because I’m seeing a particular result with other families. What’s that worth to you? Most times, the modest fee that a good advisor charges is worth every penny.

There’s another side to this, too. It always astounds me that prosperous people have quality advisors, and less prosperous ones don’t. I mean, come on, this isn’t rocket science! Did you ever think that maybe those folks have a lot of money because they have good advisors? That, alone, is proof enough for me. Sure you can do-it-yourself, but is that what wealthy people do? It’s a real laugher.

Theoretically, that makes sense. But I also hear stories about bad advisors. Say I agree with you that there is value in quality advice. What next?

Find someone really good to help. As I said earlier, structure matters, but only to a point. Competent advisors share some basic principles about personal finance. Spend less than you make. Invest for the long-term. Let the tax code increase your returns. Again, it’s not rocket science, and advisors might argue about which mutual fund is best, but most of us will agree that a growth fund is a good choice for a retirement account. Fees, funds, and brand names differ slightly, but smart investing makes sense anywhere.

One thing I’ve noticed is that the crooks usually promise something for nothing. Outsized performance or unrealistic safety. Ask yourself this? Is what they are recommending in the mainstream? Is it what you’d expect to see in Money magazine or the Wall Street Journal? If not, there’s a strong chance it’s dicey.

Once or twice, I’ve responded to a troubled client, “ninety percent of competent advisors recommend the same things we’ve done.” And I truly believe that. Personal finance is a science and there’s a body of knowledge to support our decisions. We can’t always control the results, but our choices are based on the best probabilities for achieving success. That’s what you should expect with a good advisor.

Monday, June 21, 2010

Teach your kids responsible money habits early


By Dr. Jason White
Director of Investments
Family Investment Center

Every parent faces challenges in trying to educate their children about the basic principles of financial responsibility. Children and young adults are thirsty for personal financial education. Granted, their interest generally focuses on topics like how to earn a million dollars by age 23 and spend happily ever after, but we as parents and educators can use this materialist instinct to teach basic personal financial responsibility.

Benevolent employers figured out a long time ago that employees are much more likely to participate in savings programs, such as 401(k) plans, if the employer agreed to match employees’ contributions. You can apply the same logic with your kids. If Johnny manages to save $2 from his weekly allowance, match it with a dollar of your own.

Every child should have a savings account at a local bank. Teach them to deposit their savings, rather than keep idle cash in a piggy bank. After the first few interest payments are credited to their savings account, they will begin to understand and become excited about saving money.

Once the child has accumulated a few hundred dollars in that savings account, open a brokerage account for them. I’m serious! Use an online brokerage company to maximize the child’s connectivity and interactive education. Encourage them to invest in companies that they “do business with” like McDonalds, Disney or Microsoft.

Involve your children, to the extent that you are comfortable, in family financial decisions. Even young children can begin to comprehend the amount of money it takes to pay the mortgage, and the electric bill, and the groceries, etc. Once they realize the constraints of the family budget, you may find fewer temper tantrums in the checkout line when you say no regarding a “must-have” candy bar request.

Parents can also teach children wise shopping and spending habits. Let them look for bargains and coupons in the Sunday paper for products they know and use. Teach them to comparison shop and to determine relative prices. For example, should I buy the jumbo bottle of hair gel, or is the smaller size cheaper by the ounce? I am amazed how many college students, and adults for that matter, don’t seem to have the ability to do this.

Finally, teach your child about the pitfalls of debt, particularly credit card debt. The earlier they learn the expense of using other people’s money, the better. If you loan your children money to buy a toy or video game, charge them interest. They will quickly discover what they thought they couldn’t live without, maybe they could have. You will be teaching patience, frugality and personal responsibility – a set of qualities we could use more of among today’s youth!

As your child gets older, encourage him/her to read a daily newspaper and watch the evening news. Staying plugged in to events and changes in the world help to round out an individual in more than just a financial sense.

Remember – lead by example. Believe it or not, your children really do look to you for guidance!

Friday, June 18, 2010

Moving to a foreign country not a good retirement option


By Dan Danford

I spotted this article on retiring in a foreign country on Yahoo! this morning. It's an interesting idea - your money stretches further, and you may be able to live comfortably on just social security income.

But life is about so much more than money. What will you miss out on if you move to Panama, or Mexico, and you're away from your children, grandchildren and siblings? To me, this is an extreme, and possibly even crazy, reaction to retirement, and one I wouldn't want to see any of my clients undertake unless they were perhaps originally from that country, and wanted to return - or it was a life-long dream.

It may be fine when you're 65, and in good health. But your health will turn, and you absolutely will need someone to keep an eye on your health, your medications, the doctors you see and possibly even to drive you to appointments and such. If your spouse is in good health, that can work, but counting on that isn't the best option. You really should consider moving near other family, including children, if you are not - and NOT several countries away. Also, the quality of medical facilities probably isn't ideal in a third world country.

Instead, plan. Plan to stay in the U.S. - and save accordingly. And don't make it your plan to die with a giant pile of money unless you can comfortably afford to do so and still live some.

I'd love to hear your take on this. Here's the article:

http://yhoo.it/bf6tRA

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Dad's Divorce: When to refinance

Dan Danford regularly provides commentary for Dad's Divorce.com, a web site geared toward men going through divorce - but the advice applies to anyone. This week, he answers a question about when to refinance the marital home. Got a question of your own? Leave it in the comments section.